July 7 2021 10:00 AM

    As companies work toward reducing greenhouse gas emissions, farmers may be the ones taking the greatest risks to meet this goal.

    As the race for net zero greenhouse gas emissions continues by large manufacturers all over the U.S, dairies are the ones paying the price. You have probably seen it already - the promise made by large manufacturers to become net zero emission emitters by a certain date. But have you thought of how they are planning on doing it? They have to go down their supply chain and get everyone involved to make the promise as well. The current push comes as they state that “market pressure” from consumers demands their products be sourced by “net zero” companies. However, in a race there is always risk, and dairy is getting the short end of the stick.

    Let’s first start with the pressures from a farm’s buyer, whether it be a cooperative or not. As market pressures continue to rise for them, so does the pressure for the average dairy, but where is the benefit for the dairy producer?

    We need to move past hypotheticals. There is much talk about feed additives that would reduce enteric methane from cows (methane produced by burps), but how proven is the science? We all know this has a direct correlation to milk production and reproduction. It has been stated that if dairies feed an additive that would reduce enteric methane, there may be a pay schedule available on the cap-and-trade market. However, these additives have to be balanced with cost, pay schedules for the carbon credits, the margin between the two, and the long-term health effects on cows.

    Interestingly, these concerns do not plague those who do not care for cows. The most important thing to them is that they can boast a “net zero” sticker on their product. As of right now, I have heard of no premiums from any milk buyers for “net zero” milk. The response is always, “If you want to stay in the market, this is what you are going to have to do.” It seems like a bit of a stiff arm - telling the dairy producers once again to take the risk and do the work for them.

    In California, dairies all over have been forced to commit to reducing manure methane through already proven methods that have a measurable result. Now, enteric-based theory has entered the market. Maybe this is where I am getting hung up on the whole concept. I personally cannot get over how to measure cow burps on a dairy, how to guarantee enteric reductions will be profitable and not harmful to the animals, and how dairy producers will be protected if any of these variables are realized on farm.

    I believe that progression is the key for success in any business, and the net zero plans may be the next best thing. However, before we put the proverbial cart before the horse, let’s make sure the ones taking the risk are protected first.


    Tyler Ribeiro

    Tyler Ribeiro is a fourth-generation dairy farmer born and raised in California. He is currently partners with his father at Rib-Arrow Dairy in Tulare where they proudly ship their milk to Land O’Lakes. Tyler is actively involved in the dairy industry, holding leadership roles in various organizations locally and across the United States.